Review
to overviewApproachskills

Inner Development Goals

IDG Foundation

Structure & Clarity:

Is the approach logically structured and clearly understandable in terms of content? – Rating: Fully Met
show review + hide review ×

Operationalizability:

Can the described skills be concretely observed, enhanced, or developed? – Rating: Weakly Developed
show review + hide review ×

Contextualization:

Is the societal, cultural, or technological context of the skills made visible? – Rating: Weakly Developed
show review + hide review ×

Value Orientation:

Are ethical principles, responsibility, or personal stance explicitly addressed? – Rating: Exemplary
show review + hide review ×

Societal Relevance:

Does the approach go beyond individual capabilities and address social participation or transformation? – Rating: Fully Met
show review + hide review ×

Future Relevance:

Does the approach respond to current and future challenges (e.g., sustainability, digitalization, globalization) and describe a clear relation to the future? – Rating: Fully Met
show review + hide review ×

Educational-Theoretical Reference:

Can the approach be plausibly linked to theories of education, learning, or competence? – Rating: Weakly Developed
show review + hide review ×

Competence Logic:

Is it clear which understanding of competence (e.g., knowledge-skills-attitudes, action, mindset) underlies the approach? – Rating: Weakly Developed
show review + hide review ×

Transparency of Development / Methodological Design:

Is it traceable which (research/development) methods were used to develop the approach (e.g., conceptual, empirical quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods) and who was involved? – Rating: Exemplary
show review + hide review ×

Implementation Logic / Application Logic / Responsible Actors:

Is it clear who is responsible for putting the approach into practice (e.g., learners, educators, institutions, policymakers)? – Rating: Fully Met
show review + hide review ×

Strategic Objective:

Is it evident which overarching goal (e.g., higher education development, education for sustainable development, innovation, entrepreneurship) the approach serves? – Rating: Exemplary
show review + hide review ×


Direct link to the approach (external)
Show fact sheet
Show future skills
1 Not Evident
Not Implemented
The criterion is absent. There are no discernible approaches or indications of implementation.
2 Weakly Developed
Partially Recognizable
The criterion is partially present but implemented only superficially, unsystematically, or incompletely.
3 Fully Met
Implemented and Integrated
The criterion is comprehensively, consistently, and transparently implemented and functionally integrated into the overall concept.
3* Exemplary
Implemented in a Model Fashion
The criterion is realized to an outstanding degree and serves as an exemplary or model reference for implementation in comparable contexts.

Backgroundinformation reviewcriteria

Privacy settings

You can adjust the settings for the cookies here.

Please select which cookies you would like to accept and confirm by clicking the button. You will then be redirected back to the start page.

Please note that if you check the External media box, data such as your IP address may be transmitted to Google and thus possibly to a third country without a data protection agreement. This happens especially when you watch our videos. You can find more information here: Privacy Policy